Re: [grubstreet] Re: Wiki Discussion/Pages For Pages Sake

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/4/3]

Sorry, I really don't want this, or anything like it. See the following.

> > In a nutshell: Are we trying to be an Egon Ronay guide or Yellow Pages?

Neither. We're trying to be a guide for an entire city. Food and drink are
only part of our scope, although they currently make up the majority of what
we have. If we were a dedicated restaurants guide, then we'd have listings
Yellow Pages style. As far as I'm concerned, the ethos of Grubstreet has
always been that we write about what we know, which is one of the things
making it special.

Incidentally, I'm starting to regret picking the name "Grubstreet", because
people are starting to think it's just about grub. 

Kake wrote: 
> as things have progressed people are finding new ways to index and
> categorise information and just *doing* them and getting use out of
> them. 

Great innit?

> > Maybe we need a more comprehensive tagging system for work in
> > progress, rather than just "Fix Please" and "Todo".
> 
> Go for it - via categories, maybe?

Why not? See what you can come up with....


-- 
rare in metal

-- 
grubstreet mailing list
http://london.openguides.org/old-list-archives/

• [grubstreet] Re: Wiki Discussion/Pages For Pages Sake Kate L Pugh 23:29 on 28 Mar 2003
  Whichever. Part of what I like about grubstreet is that our
  • Re: [grubstreet] Re: Wiki Discussion/Pages For Pages Sake Earle Martin 12:33 on 03 Apr 2003
    Sorry, I really don't want this, or anything like it. See the following.
    • Roger Burton West 22:55 on 03 Apr 2003
      What I use Grubstreet for at the moment is (a) to answer questions of
      • too deep to show

Archive generated by mariachi 0.51.