This is the historical archive of the now-inactive 'grubstreet' list.
Discussion on OpenGuides development
has now moved to OpenGuides-Dev.
Discussion on The Open Guide to
London now takes place on OpenGuides-London.
Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/11/9]
From: Ivor Williams
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Date: 13:35 on 09 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Date: 13:35 on 09 Nov 2002
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate L Pugh" <kake@xxxxx.xx> To: <grubstreet@xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx> Sent: 08 November 2002 16:53 Subject: Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night > On Fri 08 Nov 2002, Ivor Williams <iwilliams@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: > > > Embedded indexes - this is a possible enhancement to my +index > > patch. Why not have the ability to include an index inside an > > existing page? Please let me know if you think this would be useful. > > You mean like RecentChanges where you can edit the text on top but you > still get the automatic list of changes at the bottom? Yes. I want > this very much indeed. > I've decided I want to completely rethink and revamp my index patch. I propose that the only way to get an index is to embed one in a page. Also, the page containing the index will have full control of how it is rendered. Borrowing some syntax from Template Toolkit: [% FOREACH country = [[+National Cuisine]] %] * [[$country]] [% FOREACH rest = [[+$country]] %] ** [[$rest]] [% END %] [% END %] What do you think? Is TT style syntax too technical for our punters? I am open to other suggestions. By the way, there does not need to be a page for National Cuisine - this is just a marker that is searched for with the plus. You could also generate a list from a straight [[]] link, but this will find all occurrences, including references to the page that you don't want in the index. When it comes to implementation, I have come around to keeping [[Category foo]] as such pages will contain information about foo, and one or more indices. This will be much easier to slide in to the existing Grubstreet. Before I work on this, I would like some feedback. Thanks in advance, Ivor. -- grubstreet mailing list http://london.openguides.org/old-list-archives/
-
Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Kate L Pugh 16:53 on 08 Nov 2002
(These are just brief notes too, while they're in my head.)-
Ivor Williams
13:35 on 09 Nov 2002
From: "Kate L Pugh" <kake@xxxxx.xx>-
Kate L Pugh
13:55 on 09 Nov 2002
As just discussed on IRC:- too deep to show
-
Kate L Pugh
13:55 on 09 Nov 2002
-
Ivor Williams
13:35 on 09 Nov 2002
-
RE: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Ivor Williams 17:40 on 08 Nov 2002
By the way, my search allows wildcards * and % - I think I forgot to document-
Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Kate L Pugh 20:33 on 08 Nov 2002
That's not really stemming. Take a look at Lingua::Stem -- it'd be
-
Re: [grubstreet] Some thoughts from last night
Kate L Pugh 20:33 on 08 Nov 2002
-
Earle Martin
17:34 on 09 Nov 2002
Almost, but not quite. My idea was to put the flag links in the toolbar