This is the historical archive of the now-inactive 'grubstreet' list.
Discussion on OpenGuides development
has now moved to OpenGuides-Dev.
Discussion on The Open Guide to
London now takes place on OpenGuides-London.
Re: [grubstreet] GrubClone updates
[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/4/3]
From: Kate L Pugh
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] GrubClone updates
Date: 23:49 on 03 Apr 2003
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] GrubClone updates
Date: 23:49 on 03 Apr 2003
On Thu 03 Apr 2003, Earle Martin <grubstreet@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: > Cookies and usernames would be nice but are low on importance. It already does usernames, but only in the sense that it gives you a field on the edit page to type one in. Note that this is no less secure than the way usemod does it (anyone can register a new user number with an existing username). It is a little more hassle, but at least it means that "Roger who doesn't use cookies" can put his name in now :) Actually the only reason I do it like this is that I don't care enough to spend the hour or so writing the code to sort it out with cookies when I can just type "Kake" several hundred times. > I'd rate InterWiki as an important feature for CGI::Wiki to have, Agreed, thanks, I'd forgotten that - it's on the CGI::Wiki to-do list now. Is it essential for grubstreet as it stands at the moment though? > and GrubClone should ideally have the ModWiki RSS feature (one for > your RDF learning homework perhaps?). Argh, OK, is this essential? I know we already have RSS feeds of the recent changes; are people going to want to kill me with blunt knives if we move over to CGI::Wiki before I've implemented RSS? "Yes - get on with it" is an acceptable answer. Ta for the feedback - others please shout if you care; now is the time to say what's important to you so I can actually get it sorted before we swap. Kake -- grubstreet mailing list http://london.openguides.org/old-list-archives/
-
Re: [grubstreet] GrubClone updates
Earle Martin 18:09 on 03 Apr 2003
Shiny! Lovely!-
Kate L Pugh
23:49 on 03 Apr 2003
It already does usernames, but only in the sense that it gives you a-
Earle Martin
13:59 on 04 Apr 2003
Okay, fair enough. Perhaps I can look into that one.- too deep to show
-
Earle Martin
14:01 on 04 Apr 2003
Oops, one more (tiny) thing: on your user stats feature, the output is- too deep to show
-
Earle Martin
13:59 on 04 Apr 2003
-
Kate L Pugh
23:49 on 03 Apr 2003
-
Kate L Pugh
17:23 on 05 Apr 2003
Thanks, bob. I'm still hacking on this RDF stuff (argh am meant to be