This is the historical archive of the now-inactive 'grubstreet' list.
Discussion on OpenGuides development
has now moved to OpenGuides-Dev.
Discussion on The Open Guide to
London now takes place on OpenGuides-London.
RE: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/12/11]
From: Ivor Williams
Subject: RE: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Date: 15:26 on 11 Dec 2002
Subject: RE: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Date: 15:26 on 11 Dec 2002
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:12 PM, Kate L Pugh [SMTP:kake@xxxxx.xx] wrote: > On Wed 11 Dec 2002, Alex McLintock <alex@xxxx.xx.xx> wrote: > > At 02:28 11/12/02, you wrote: > > >grubstreet seem to eb tellign me its read only now. is this right. > > > > At the risk of stating the obvious..... it is read only for me too. > > Seems to have fixed itself now, though that might be because I logged > in with admin privileges. Is it working for other people too, now? > Nope. -- grubstreet mailing list http://london.openguides.org/old-list-archives/
-
[grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Bob Walker 02:28 on 11 Dec 2002
---
Re: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Alex McLintock 12:20 on 11 Dec 2002
At the risk of stating the obvious..... it is read only for me too.-
Kate L Pugh
15:12 on 11 Dec 2002
Seems to have fixed itself now, though that might be because I logged
-
Kate L Pugh
15:12 on 11 Dec 2002
-
RE: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Ivor Williams 14:57 on 11 Dec 2002
wrote: -
Ivor Williams
15:26 on 11 Dec 2002
Nope.-
Re: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Kate L Pugh 15:32 on 11 Dec 2002
I've explicitly unset the editlock and I can now edit as a normal user.- too deep to show
-
Re: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Kate L Pugh 15:32 on 11 Dec 2002
-
Re: [grubstreet] hmmmmm read only?
Alex McLintock 12:20 on 11 Dec 2002