This is the historical archive of the now-inactive 'grubstreet' list.
Discussion on OpenGuides development
has now moved to OpenGuides-Dev.
Discussion on The Open Guide to
London now takes place on OpenGuides-London.
Re: [grubstreet] Wiki indexing patch
[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/5/9]
From: Ivor Williams
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] Wiki indexing patch
Date: 22:59 on 09 May 2002
Subject: Re: [grubstreet] Wiki indexing patch
Date: 22:59 on 09 May 2002
> Kate L Pugh <kake@xxxxx.xx> wrote: > >> Ivor, did you see my previous mail discussing problems with the patch? > > Just a few notes on initial testing: > If you try to index something (eg by URL munging) that doesn't have > any results, the page is just blank; it doesn't say "no results". > See for example > http://the.earth.li/~kake/cgi-bin/wikibeta.pl?id=Marmalade&action=index OK, making it say "no results" is quite easy to do. I will do so. > If you do a plus-link (+Foo) to a nonexistent page, then it displays > as Foo? where the ? is a link to edit the page -- there is nothing to > click on to index it. I'm not sure whether this is a bug or a > feature; I'd say the former, since it breaks the expected behaviour of > a plus-link -- as I understand it, the plus links are about indexes > rather than pages. See for example > http://the.earth.li/~kake/cgi-bin/wikibeta.pl?Chinese_Food This was intended as a 'feature'. However, thinking about it, why does an index have to have a real page? This will probably require a refactoring of my change to the freelink handling code - but it's doable. > I can't seem to make the second kind of link (>Foo) work at all; see for > example > http://the.earth.li/~kake/cgi-bin/wikibeta.pl?Vegetarian_Food Ah, oops! A debugging I will go. Will post when I have a new patch ready. By the way, any thoughts about version numbers? It might make discussion a bit easier. Ivor. -- grubstreet mailing list http://london.openguides.org/old-list-archives/
-
Kate L Pugh
22:31 on 09 May 2002
Check out the archives:-
Ivor Williams
22:59 on 09 May 2002
OK, making it say "no results" is quite easy to do. I will do so.
-
Ivor Williams
22:59 on 09 May 2002